Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] thermal: intel_bxt_pmic_thermal: Use first level PMIC thermal irq

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan
<sathyaosid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan
>> <sathyaosid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Let's assume we applied patches 1 and 2, does it mean the regression
>> to the existing behaviour?
>
> Yes, Just applying patch 1 & 2 and not apply patch 3 will create
> regression in thermal driver.
>
> Since there is no compilation dependency between patch 2 & 3 and they
> are from two different domains, I submitted them separately to make it
> easier for review.

And this is exactly bisectability (level 2 :-) ) issue.
Basically you confirmed you need to squash them like I said.

>> (For example, device worked improperly in some cases -> stopped
>> working completely)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html