Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] thermal: intel_bxt_pmic_thermal: Use first level PMIC thermal irq

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Natarajan
<sathyaosid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:37 AM,
>> <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> PMIC mfd driver only exports first level irq for thermal device.
>>> But currently we are reading the irqs from the second level irq
>>> chip, So this patch fixes this issue by adding support to use
>>> first level PMIC thermal irq.
>>>
>>
>> Shouldn't be this squashed to patch 2?
>
> There is no compilation dependency between patch 2 and 3. But they are
> functionally dependent.
>
> Should we squash functionally dependent patches too ?

Let's assume we applied patches 1 and 2, does it mean the regression
to the existing behaviour?

(For example, device worked improperly in some cases -> stopped
working completely)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html