On Thu, 2017-05-11 at 16:50 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Add GPIO interrupt information to pinctrl data. Added to the original > > version from Jerome was data for Meson GXL. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx> > > So what this does is: > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.h > > b/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.h > > index 1aa871d5..890f296f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.h > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/meson/pinctrl-meson.h > > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ enum meson_reg_type { > > * @name: bank name > > * @first: first pin of the bank > > * @last: last pin of the bank > > + * @irq: hwirq base number of the bank > > * @regs: array of register descriptors > > * > > * A bank represents a set of pins controlled by a contiguous set of > > @@ -92,6 +93,8 @@ struct meson_bank { > > const char *name; > > unsigned int first; > > unsigned int last; > > + int irq_first; > > + int irq_last; > > struct meson_reg_desc regs[NUM_REG]; > > }; > > ... adds a per-bank parent IRQ. Hi Linus, It does not add a per-bank parent IRQ. The meson gpio irq is an IP independent of the gpio/pinctrl subsystem. In a nutshell, we have 8 interrupts on the GIC and we can route the signal of almost any pin of any bank to these parent irqs. The fact that there 1 gpio-irq controller and several gpio controller make the design a bit tricky We already talked about this IP, here is the discussion :https://patchwork.ozlab s.org/patch/684208/ At the time, the problem was that I was creating the mapping within the gpio_to_irq callback, which is wrong. irq_first, irq_last were introduced because there is no way to have direct mapping between the gpio number and the hw interrupt number. (details are in our previous discussion). If a more generic solution can be used for this, it would be nice :) While I think having a irqdomain in the gpio driver and using the request_resources callback to create the mapping in the underlying domain might be a solution to ressouce allocation problem we had, I think the meson-gpio-irq should be implemented has an independent driver because it is an independent device. Eventually, this device should be the parent irq controller of the gpio controller. I not sure that there is a reason for using syscon here, or if it is a good idea to have the data of this controller as globals for the gpio driver ... > > I am just discussing with Thierry that I would like to see some code > in the gpiolib core to deal with this mapping so we don't have to do a > whole lot of custom back mapping between parent IRQs and cascaded > IRQ in every driver that has a multiple-bank concept. > > Please contribute to the discission, see thread subject: > "[PATCH v2] gpio: Add Tegra186 support" > > Yours, > Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html