On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Charles Keepax
<ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The logic to check if the pin is an input or output whilst testing if we
> need to read the register value from the hardware or not is currently
> inverted. Remove the erroneous not from the if statement.
>
> Fixes: 11598d174050 ("gpio: arizona: Correct handling for reading input GPIOs")
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] gpio: arizona: Correct check whether the pin is an input
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: arizona: Correct check whether the pin is an input
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:22:48 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1492594244-27361-1-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
- References: <1492594244-27361-1-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
- References:
- [PATCH] gpio: arizona: Correct check whether the pin is an input
- From: Charles Keepax
- [PATCH] gpio: arizona: Correct check whether the pin is an input
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpio: export add/remove lookup table functions
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] gpio: gpio-wcove: fix irq pending status bit width
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] gpio: arizona: Correct check whether the pin is an input
- Next by thread: [PATCH] pinctrl: make artpec6 explicitly non-modular
- Index(es):
 |