On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:24:49 +0300 Andy Shevchenko andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx wrote: ... >...and still a question "Do we go with stubs for them in case of !GPIOLIB?" I've just sent a patch. >Patch below looks good to me: Thanks for review! Anatolij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] gpio: export add/remove lookup table functions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: export add/remove lookup table functions
- From: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:08:01 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CAHp75VeHmOpSAAZM87_0Y120mrXpPG0aCns=Zp5tBTMh3GBXmw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <1492723400-16657-1-git-send-email-agust@denx.de> <CAHp75VeHmOpSAAZM87_0Y120mrXpPG0aCns=Zp5tBTMh3GBXmw@mail.gmail.com>
- References:
- [PATCH] gpio: export add/remove lookup table functions
- From: Anatolij Gustschin
- Re: [PATCH] gpio: export add/remove lookup table functions
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH] gpio: export add/remove lookup table functions
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] gpiolib: Add stubs for gpiod lookup table interface
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpio: arizona: Correct check whether the pin is an input
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Add stubs for gpiod lookup table interface
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpio: export add/remove lookup table functions
- Index(es):
 |