On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 01:52:14PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:35:04PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:27:16PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote: > >> > > Use devm_gpiochip_add_data to simplify the error path in > >> > > samsung_gpiolib_register. Additionally this would also fix a leak if > >> > > the pinctrl driver was unbound, although admittedly I can't see any > >> > > good use-case for doing so, but the driver does currently allow it. > >> > > >> > Driver does not allow unbinding (.suppress_bind_attrs = true)... > >> > > >> > >> Oops... sorry missed that. > > > > Can you resend with updated commit msg? I think it was not picked up by > > Linus yet. > > I'm expecting you to pick it up and send to me by pull request now I guess, > or did we agree that a Samsung patches wouldn't be too voluminous this > cycle? > > If you're OK with it, can we proceed to use you as Samsung patch > collection point for this kernel cycle from this moment on? I will take it, especially that more things are coming. I already applied patch from Chanwoo which should go to fixes (initially I put it on wrong branch). Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html