On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > A modern compiler should know better when to inline, so drop the inline > keywords. > > Signed-off-by: Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@xxxxxxxxx> A bit hesitant about this but whatever, patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 6/6] gpio: mvebu: let the compiler inline
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] gpio: mvebu: let the compiler inline
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:44:58 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20170316063402.8667-7-ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com>
- References: <20170316063402.8667-1-ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com> <20170316063402.8667-7-ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] gpio: mvebu: let the compiler inline
- From: Ralph Sennhauser
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] gpio: mvebu: let the compiler inline
- References:
- [PATCH 0/6] gpio: mvebu: prepatatory cleanup for pwm-fan support
- From: Ralph Sennhauser
- [PATCH 6/6] gpio: mvebu: let the compiler inline
- From: Ralph Sennhauser
- [PATCH 0/6] gpio: mvebu: prepatatory cleanup for pwm-fan support
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/6] gpio: mvebu: checkpatch: unsigned int fixes
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 6/6] gpio: mvebu: let the compiler inline
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 6/6] gpio: mvebu: let the compiler inline
- Index(es):
 |