Hi,
On 13-03-17 20:19, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Mon, 2017-03-13 at 18:56 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 13-03-17 18:23, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 21:58 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
I will incorporate slightly different version of this (due to
changes
happened) into my branch. Please verify if everything is okay.
I just noticed that my patch was botched up a bit, it is
taking a more complex approach then needed and it contained a bug
(it did lookup->index = index, which should be lookup->index = i).
I've just finished writing a v2 (sorry).
NP.
Does it mean this one replaces both from v2? (to me looks like)
Yes it replaces both.
I've attached the v2 here,
note this is against an unmodified v4.11-rc2 rather then your branch
as I needed a clean base to debug some problems. But it should be
easy to adapt to your branch I think.
Note this can go upstream either way (through your branch or
directly since it is based on a clean v4.11-rc2 now) but it is
probably easier to take it upstream through your branch to
avoid conflicts.
I will rebase my series on your patch, but I'm going to slightly modify
it anyway (basically squash one of my patches).
Ok, sounds good. If you're going to use my patch as a base,
shall I cherry-pick the version with your changes squashed and
submit that upstream stand-alone ?
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
