On 03/07/2017 10:52 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > In case a platform only defaults a "default" set of pins, but not a > "sleep" set of pins, and this particular platform suspends and resumes > in a way that the pin states are not preserved by the hardware, when we > resume, we would call pinctrl_single_resume() -> pinctrl_force_default() > -> pinctrl_select_state() and the first thing we do is check that the > pins state is the same as before, and do nothing. > > In order to fix this, just remove the p->state == state check from > pinctrl_select_state() since it would not allow callers of this function > to get the pins to be brought into the expected state. > > Fixes: 6e5e959dde0d ("pinctrl: API changes to support multiple states per device") > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> > --- Linus am I hitting some of your spam folder, or you are really having way too much fun with Gemini ;) ? > Changes in v4: > > - just remove the p->state == state check because it cannot allow pinctrl_select_state > to work for callers that expect it to do the actual state change > > Changes in v3: > > - move the state check to pinctrl_select_state > > Changes in v2: > > - rename __pinctrl_select_state to pinctrl_commit_state > > drivers/pinctrl/core.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c > index d69046537b75..33cef0a65c9c 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c > @@ -1203,9 +1203,6 @@ int pinctrl_select_state(struct pinctrl *p, struct pinctrl_state *state) > struct pinctrl_state *old_state = p->state; > int ret; > > - if (p->state == state) > - return 0; > - > if (p->state) { > /* > * For each pinmux setting in the old state, forget SW's record > -- Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html