On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2017-03-09 1:34 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:15:16AM -0400, Sergio Prado wrote: >>> Hi Krzysztof, >>> >>> > > This is a regression from commit 8b1bd11c1f8f529057369c5b3702d13fd24e2765. >>> > >>> > Checkpatch should complain here about commit format. >>> > >>> > > >>> > > Tested on FriendlyARM mini2440. >>> > > >>> > >>> > Please add: >>> > Fixes: 8b1bd11c1f8f ("pinctrl: samsung: Add the support the multiple IORESOURCE_MEM for one pin-bank") >>> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> > >>> >>> OK. >>> >>> > > Signed-off-by: Sergio Prado <sergio.prado@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> > > --- >>> > > drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c24xx.c | 4 ++-- >>> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> > > >>> > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c24xx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c24xx.c >>> > > index b82a003546ae..1b8d887796e8 100644 >>> > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c24xx.c >>> > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c24xx.c >>> > > @@ -356,8 +356,8 @@ static inline void s3c24xx_demux_eint(struct irq_desc *desc, >>> > > { >>> > > struct s3c24xx_eint_data *data = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc); >>> > > struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); >>> > > - struct irq_data *irqd = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc); >>> > > - struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irqd); >>> > > + struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d = data->drvdata; >>> > > + struct samsung_pin_bank *bank = d->pin_banks; >>> > >>> > I think 'pin_banks' point to all banks of given controller not to the >>> > currently accessed one. >>> >>> Understood. I think it worked in my tests because on s3c2440 all banks >>> have the same eint base address. >>> >>> So what do you think is the best approach to solve this problem? >> >> Maybe you can get to this through: >> s3c24xx_eint_domain_data = s3c24xx_eint_data->domains[virq].host_data; >> s3c24xx_eint_domain_data->bank >> >> It is getting slightly more complicated... > > How about the suggestions I made in my reply from March 4 (JST)? Yes, this also looks like solution. I am not sure how much you would like to revert but wouldn't it create duplicated members in pinctrl structures? One for Exynos and other for S3C? Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html