On Thursday, January 26, 2017 10:46:25 AM CET Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Marek Szyprowski > <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2017-01-26 10:10, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Marek Szyprowski > >> <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> This patch moves pad retention control from PMU driver to Exynos pin > >>> controller driver. This helps to avoid possible ordering and logical > >>> dependencies between machine, PMU and pin control code. Till now it > >>> worked fine only because sys_ops for PMU and pin controller were called > >>> in registration order. > >>> This is also a preparation for adding new features to Exynos pin > >>> controller driver, like runtime power management and suspending > >>> individual pin controllers, which might be a part of some power domain. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 64 -------------- > >>> drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 145 > >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > >> This makes all kind of sense, but I would ideally like an ACK > >> from the ARM SoC maintainer(s): Arnd, Olof, are you OK with > >> this? Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > Isn't enough to have Krzysztof's (Exynos SoC maintainer) 'reviewed-by' tag? > > I assume that 'reviewed-by' also includes 'acked-by'. > > If the SoC maintainers are too stressed to answer in reasonable time > or I just get randomly bored of waiting yes, I usually apply it anyway. > > Just want to give them a heads-up essentially. Agreed, that is a reasonable strategy. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html