Re: [PATCH v3 11/13] pinctrl: samsung: Move retention control from mach-exynos to the pinctrl driver

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2017-01-26 10:10, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Marek Szyprowski
>> <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch moves pad retention control from PMU driver to Exynos pin
>>> controller driver. This helps to avoid possible ordering and logical
>>> dependencies between machine, PMU and pin control code. Till now it
>>> worked fine only because sys_ops for PMU and pin controller were called
>>> in registration order.
>>> This is also a preparation for adding new features to Exynos pin
>>> controller driver, like runtime power management and suspending
>>> individual pin controllers, which might be a part of some power domain.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c           |  64 --------------
>>>   drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 145
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> This makes all kind of sense, but I would ideally like an ACK
>> from the ARM SoC maintainer(s): Arnd, Olof, are you OK with
>> this?
>
>
> Isn't enough to have Krzysztof's (Exynos SoC maintainer) 'reviewed-by' tag?
> I assume that 'reviewed-by' also includes 'acked-by'.

If the SoC maintainers are too stressed to answer in reasonable time
or I just get randomly bored of waiting yes, I usually apply it anyway.

Just want to give them a heads-up essentially.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html