On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 15:35 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 13:21 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is overall fine. However I have another patch in the works from > > Alexander Stein to pass down the label to the core properly, can you > > look > > at this patch too, so we don't have to mess around too much? > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-gpio&m=148179211709228&w=2 > > > > Which patch should we base on which patch? Or can they be > > combined into one? > > That patch has been held back awaiting ACKs and already > > has an ACK from Jacek so I would merge it first. Could you > > rebase this patch on top of Alexander's patch? > > > > At the first glance looks okay to just merge it. > Means I don't see it might affect functionality of what I'm trying to > do. > > So, please, go ahead and thanks for pointing out. I will prepare mine > on > top of it. Alas, it doesn't apply clearly. gpio_keys_polled.c has been changed a lot from that time. So, would you like to fix it yourself? Since mine is applied clearly I may do other way around, rebase and fix that patch on top of mine. How does it sound? -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html