On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Make fwnode_get_named_gpiod() consistent with the rest of gpiod_get() like API, > i.e. configure GPIO pin immediately after request. > > Besides obvious clean up it will help to configure pins based on firmware > provided resources. > > Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> This is overall fine. However I have another patch in the works from Alexander Stein to pass down the label to the core properly, can you look at this patch too, so we don't have to mess around too much? http://marc.info/?l=linux-gpio&m=148179211709228&w=2 Which patch should we base on which patch? Or can they be combined into one? That patch has been held back awaiting ACKs and already has an ACK from Jacek so I would merge it first. Could you rebase this patch on top of Alexander's patch? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html