Hi Linus, On 2016년 11월 08일 22:17, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:58 PM, kbuild test robot > <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel >> head: 05e51a4da2af5f68c911adcb888f103460a2e5b3 >> commit: e40fde2c098df8bbaf82b5b80b43aa49eb2cb9af [43/47] pinctrl: samsung: Add the support the multiple IORESOURCE_MEM for one pin-bank >> config: arm-allmodconfig (attached as .config) >> compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 >> reproduce: >> wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross >> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross >> git checkout e40fde2c098df8bbaf82b5b80b43aa49eb2cb9af >> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >> make.cross ARCH=arm >> >> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> >> drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c64xx.c: In function 's3c64xx_irq_set_function': >>>> drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c64xx.c:283:9: error: 'struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data' has no member named 'virt_base'; did you mean 'pin_base'? >> reg = d->virt_base + bank->pctl_offset; >> ^~ > > This patch does not compile. I took out both patches from my tree as they > are causing build regressions. > > Please develop against the latest release candidate or the "devel" branch > in the pin control tree. > > Please also split the patches better as Krzysztof requested. I'm sorry for my mistake. I'll resend the patch after fixing it. Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html