On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:58 PM, kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel > head: 05e51a4da2af5f68c911adcb888f103460a2e5b3 > commit: e40fde2c098df8bbaf82b5b80b43aa49eb2cb9af [43/47] pinctrl: samsung: Add the support the multiple IORESOURCE_MEM for one pin-bank > config: arm-allmodconfig (attached as .config) > compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 > reproduce: > wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > git checkout e40fde2c098df8bbaf82b5b80b43aa49eb2cb9af > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make.cross ARCH=arm > > All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c64xx.c: In function 's3c64xx_irq_set_function': >>> drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-s3c64xx.c:283:9: error: 'struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data' has no member named 'virt_base'; did you mean 'pin_base'? > reg = d->virt_base + bank->pctl_offset; > ^~ This patch does not compile. I took out both patches from my tree as they are causing build regressions. Please develop against the latest release candidate or the "devel" branch in the pin control tree. Please also split the patches better as Krzysztof requested. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html