On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2016-04-08 11:38 GMT+02:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> while ((stat = readl_relaxed(vic->base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS))) { >> irq = ffs(stat) - 1; >> handle_domain_irq(vic->domain, irq, regs); >> handled = 1; >> } >> >> return handled; >> } > > Indeed, it would be better doing it like this. > Do you think I could even do this with two nested loops to reduce the > number of reg accesses? > It would look like this (just compiled, not tested): > > static void stm32_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) > { > struct irq_domain *domain = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc); > struct irq_chip_generic *gc = domain->gc->gc[0]; > struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); > unsigned long pending; > int n; > > chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); > > while ((pending = irq_reg_readl(gc, EXTI_PR))) { > for_each_set_bit(n, &pending, BITS_PER_LONG) { > generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(domain, n)); > } > } Looks clever! :) If it also works, I'm in for it. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html