Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pinctrl:Intel: implement gpio_irq_enable

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Westerberg, Mika
<mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 03:07:33PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Qipeng Zha <qipeng.zha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > There is unexpected gpio interrupt after irq_enable. If not
>> > implemeted gpio_irq_enable callback, irq_enable calls irq_unmask
>> > instead. But if there was interrupt set before the irq_enable,
>> > unmask it may trigger the unexpected interrupt. By implementing
>> > the gpio_irq_enable callback, do interrupt status ack, the issue
>> > has gone.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Qipeng Zha <qipeng.zha@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Patch applied for fixes.
>
> Linus, what happend to these two patches? I do not find them in the
> mainline for some reason.

I guess lack of patience or me being slow :)

It's there now AFAICT.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html