Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pinctrl:Intel: implement gpio_irq_enable

["Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 03:07:33PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Qipeng Zha <qipeng.zha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > From: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > There is unexpected gpio interrupt after irq_enable. If not
> > implemeted gpio_irq_enable callback, irq_enable calls irq_unmask
> > instead. But if there was interrupt set before the irq_enable,
> > unmask it may trigger the unexpected interrupt. By implementing
> > the gpio_irq_enable callback, do interrupt status ack, the issue
> > has gone.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Qipeng Zha <qipeng.zha@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Patch applied for fixes.

Linus, what happend to these two patches? I do not find them in the
mainline for some reason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html