On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > +static int stm32_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) > +{ > + struct stm32_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(chip->parent); > + struct stm32_gpio_bank *bank = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > + unsigned int irq; > + > + regmap_field_write(pctl->irqmux[offset], bank->range.id); No. You must implement the irqchip and GPIO controllers to be orthogonal, doing things like this creates a semantic that assumes .to_irq() is always called before using the IRQ and that is not guaranteed at all. A consumer may very well use an interrupt right off the irqchip without this being called first. All this function should do is translate a number. No other semantics. This needs to be done from the irqchip (sorry). Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html