On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Linus Walleij wrote: > As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative > error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all > drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1]. > We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern. > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Lee: as mentioned in 00/54: either apply this directly > or ACK it and I will take it into the GPIO tree. > --- > drivers/mfd/htc-egpio.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Applied, thanks. > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/htc-egpio.c b/drivers/mfd/htc-egpio.c > index d334e7d8a77d..c636b5f83cfb 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/htc-egpio.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/htc-egpio.c > @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static int egpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) > value = egpio_readw(ei, reg); > pr_debug("readw(%p + %x) = %x\n", > ei->base_addr, reg << ei->bus_shift, value); > - return value & bit; > + return !!(value & bit); > } > > static int egpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html