On Fri, 2025-03-14 at 09:49 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:19:22PM +0000, Nuno Sá wrote: > > reg: > > maxItems: 1 > > @@ -63,13 +70,26 @@ allOf: > > properties: > > gpio-reserved-ranges: false > > else: > > - properties: > > - gpio-reserved-ranges: > > - maxItems: 1 > > - items: > > + if: > > Do not nest if:then:else:if:then, it leads to code impossible to read. > Just provide if-then cases for each of your variant. > Alright... > > > > > + properties: > > + compatible: > > + contains: > > + enum: > > + - adi,adp5585-00 > > + - adi,adp5585-02 > > + - adi,adp5585-03 > > + - adi,adp5585-04 > > + then: > > + properties: > > + gpio-reserved-ranges: > > + maxItems: 1 > > one tem? > > > items: > > - - const: 5 > > - - const: 1 > > But here two... > > > + items: > > + - const: 5 > > + - const: 1 > > and this is confusing. I don't get what you want to express. > I just kept it as before (maybe I messed up in some other way but the 2 items: were already in the binding): https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.14-rc6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/adi,adp5585.yaml#L70 If this is not needed I can simplifying during this patch. Is this sufficient? ... gpio-reserved-ranges: maxItems: 1 items: - const: 5 - const: 1 Thx! - Nuno Sá