El vie, 3 ene 2025 a las 4:04, Kyle Hendry (<kylehendrydev@xxxxxxxxx>) escribió: > > On 2024-12-30 08:42, Jonas Gorski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 11:41 AM Álvaro Fernández Rojas > > <noltari@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> From: Kyle Hendry <kylehendrydev@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> There is no guarantee that the bootloader will leave the pin configuration > >> in a known default state, so pinctrl needs to be explicitly set in some > >> cases. This patch adds a gpio function for drivers that need it, i.e. > >> gpio-leds. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kyle Hendry <kylehendrydev@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > bcm63268-pinctrl implements pinmux_ops::gpio_request_enable(), which > > should automatically set any requested GPIO pin to the GPIO function, > > so explicitly requesting the gpio function for a pin should not be > > needed. Is this not enough? > > > > Best Regards, > > Jonas > > > > > I assumed that as well, but nothing I tried worked with gpio-leds. > gpiochip_generic_request() does call gpio_request_enable(), but gpio-leds > uses devm_fwnode_gpiod_get() which looks like a different code path. The > only place it seems to be configuring the gpio is in create_gpio_led() > where it needs a pinctl node in the device tree. That's just my reading > of the code, though. I haven't set up a ftrace to verify it. > > Best Regards, > Kyle As Kyle pointed out it's not enough and gpio_request_enable() doesn't get called from gpio-leds. I will try to investigate this and report back. Best regards, Álvaro.