Hi Claudiu, On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:56 AM Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09.12.2024 15:51, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Inside this block there are several return statements. > > As we know DMA is not available when we get here, these do not > > need to call rz_ssi_release_dma_channels() hence do not use > > "goto err_release_dma_chs". > > However, this may be missed when making future changes. > > So perhaps it may be prudent to make this safer, by moving this inside > > the failure branch of the rz_ssi_dma_request() check above? > > I agree! As this series is already big enough I would prefer to handle it > after it is integrated. Keeping it like this doesn't impact the RZ/G3S support. > > Are you OK with this approach? Fine for me! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds