Hi Claudiu, On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 2:36 PM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Use goto label names that specify their action. In this way we can have > a better understanding of what is the action associated with the label > by just reading the label name. > > Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for your patch! Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > --- a/sound/soc/renesas/rz-ssi.c > +++ b/sound/soc/renesas/rz-ssi.c > @@ -1084,15 +1084,15 @@ static int rz_ssi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > /* Error Interrupt */ > ssi->irq_int = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "int_req"); > if (ssi->irq_int < 0) { > - rz_ssi_release_dma_channels(ssi); > - return ssi->irq_int; > + ret = ssi->irq_int; > + goto err_release_dma_chs; > } > > ret = devm_request_irq(dev, ssi->irq_int, &rz_ssi_interrupt, > 0, dev_name(dev), ssi); > if (ret < 0) { > - rz_ssi_release_dma_channels(ssi); > - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "irq request error (int_req)\n"); > + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "irq request error (int_req)\n"); > + goto err_release_dma_chs; > } > > if (!rz_ssi_is_dma_enabled(ssi)) { Inside this block there are several return statements. As we know DMA is not available when we get here, these do not need to call rz_ssi_release_dma_channels() hence do not use "goto err_release_dma_chs". However, this may be missed when making future changes. So perhaps it may be prudent to make this safer, by moving this inside the failure branch of the rz_ssi_dma_request() check above? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds