Hi Dmitry, Sorry for me being so damned slow. On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 02:43:14PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Dmitry Torokhov >> <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > We should not fall back to the legacy unnamed gpio lookup style if the >> > driver requests gpios with different names, because we'll give out the same >> > gpio twice. Let's keep track of the names that were used for the device and >> > only do the fallback for the first name used. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > >> > v1: incorporated changes suggested by Mika Westerberg in response to the >> > draft patch I posted in Goodix thread. >> > >> > v2: moved acpi_can_fallback_to_crs body to drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c >> > and provided stub for !CONFIG_ACPI case to fix build error if ACPI is >> > disabled. >> >> Patch applied with Mika's ACK. >> >> Had to fuzz a bit to make it apply, hope nothing breaks. > > Hmm, I'd like to get this patch into my tree as well to apply Irina's > goodix pieces on top to make sure they do not break. Would it be OK for > me to just apply the patch and hope git will sort it out when we merge > into next/mainline, you maybe you could prepare a 4.3-based branch with > the patch for me to pull? I had to fuzz the patch so then you need to get the version I applied out of my tree. But I'm not going to rebase the tree so you can pull commit 9c3c9bc9cc980d8981f75109f3921576daf75723 from the GPIO tree if you like. Or I can make a tag there if you prefer, just tell me. I'm stacking a loooot of GPIO patches on top, so I prefer not to have any conflicts. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html