Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: tighten up ACPI legacy gpio lookups

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We should not fall back to the legacy unnamed gpio lookup style if the
> driver requests gpios with different names, because we'll give out the same
> gpio twice. Let's keep track of the names that were used for the device and
> only do the fallback for the first name used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> v1: incorporated changes suggested by Mika Westerberg in response to the
> draft patch I posted in Goodix thread.
>
> v2: moved acpi_can_fallback_to_crs body to drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> and provided stub for !CONFIG_ACPI case to fix build error if ACPI is
> disabled.

Patch applied with Mika's ACK.

Had to fuzz a bit to make it apply, hope nothing breaks.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html