On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:45:30AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > We should not fall back to the legacy unnamed gpio lookup style if the > driver requests gpios with different names, because we'll give out the same > gpio twice. Let's keep track of the names that were used for the device and > only do the fallback for the first name used. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: tighten up ACPI legacy gpio lookups
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: tighten up ACPI legacy gpio lookups
- From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 11:02:11 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20151111194530.GA26559@dtor-ws>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
- References:
- [PATCH v2] gpiolib: tighten up ACPI legacy gpio lookups
- From: Dmitry Torokhov
- [PATCH v2] gpiolib: tighten up ACPI legacy gpio lookups
- Prev by Date: gpio-pxa driver and pincontrol
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2][RFC] pinctrl: sh-pfc: share/reuse same PORT_GP_x() macros
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: tighten up ACPI legacy gpio lookups
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: tighten up ACPI legacy gpio lookups
- Index(es):
 |