Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/4] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Add PINMUX_SINGLE()

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>         Hi,
>
> Currently single-function pins are described using the raw PINMUX_DATA()
> macro.
>
> Morimoto-san doesn't like that. He proposed to use the existing
> PINMUX_IPSR_NOGP() macro instead (cfr. "[RFC] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7795:
> Add pinmux data for single-function pins",
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg44823.html).
> However, that macro is intended to describe a pinmux configuration
> without GPIO function, which feels wrong to me.
>
> This patch series proposes an alternative, introducing a new macro
> PINMUX_SINGLE() to describe a pinmux configuration for a single-function
> pin. It also converts the existing single-function pin descriptions.

If Laurent gives his ACK you can stack these patches for your
next pull request.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html