Re: [PULL gpio-for-next] gpio: make flags mandatory for gpiod_get functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Linus,

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 02:28:25PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm all for taking this into -next ASAP then. Linus has control over
> > the tree though, so his action is required.
> 
> I am pushing it today.
> 
> I finally found this message in my messy inbox. I'm a bit up over my
> ears in patches...
This somehow failed.  My tag is merged in your devel branch, but this
contains several commits missing in your for-next. Is this intended?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux