Re: [PULL gpio-for-next] gpio: make flags mandatory for gpiod_get functions

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello Linus, hello Alexandre,
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 12:51:38PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:07:59AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> > now that all patches that were in next hit Linus Torvalds' tree and
>>> > v4.2-rc1 is out here comes the promised pull request that makes usage of
>>> > the flags parameter mandatory for gpiod_get et al:
>>> >
>>> > The following changes since commit d770e558e21961ad6cfdf0ff7df0eb5d7d4f0754:
>>> >
>>> >   Linux 4.2-rc1 (2015-07-05 11:01:52 -0700)
>>> >
>>> > are available in the git repository at:
>>> >
>>> >   git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/linux.git tags/gpiod-flags-for-4.3
>>> >
>>> > for you to fetch changes up to b17d1bf16cc72a374a48d748940f700009d40ff4:
>>> >
>>> >   gpio: make flags mandatory for gpiod_get functions (2015-07-06 10:39:24 +0200)
>>> gentle ping!
>> the (or at least my) plan was to get this into next early after the
>> merge window for 4.2 closes. Now we're already at -rc2. Can you please
>> comment?
>>
>> As of next-20150715 there don't seem to be any new users of gpiod
>> without flags btw.
>
> I'm all for taking this into -next ASAP then. Linus has control over
> the tree though, so his action is required.

I am pushing it today.

I finally found this message in my messy inbox. I'm a bit up over my
ears in patches...

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html