On 07/16/2015 02:25 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Grygorii Strashko
<grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> wrote:
Assign GPIO chip owner field to chip->dev->driver->owner if it was not
configured by GPIO driver.
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
Patch applied with Alex' review tag.
There is also one positive additional side effect:
lines like below can be removed from a lot of GPIO
drivers
rdc321x_gpio_dev->chip.owner = THIS_MODULE;
Yes let's do this :)
Or actually, I have had some second thought to why gpio_chip
is duplicating struct members from struct device at all.
Why should it even have "owner" and "of_node"?
Should we not just rewrite this code to follow the struct device *dev
pointer in gpio_chip and use "owner" and "of_node" from there?
Seems not all drivers implemented using Dev/Driver approach,
so they don't have dev at all ;)
gpio-samsung.c for example (non-DT driver).
--
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html