Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: dwapb: Use human understandable gpio numbering.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 16 Jul 2015, at 9:52 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Michael van der Westhuizen
> <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> In my case, I have quite a lot of vendor-supplied code that needs the numbers to
>> be stable and backward compatible.  This quickly devolves into a discussion of
>> GPIOs in sysfs as an ABI, which is not a discussion I want to have :)
> 
> That is impossible to avoid.
> 
> What you're saying is you just want to drill a hole in the boat and not
> have a discussion whether the boat is going to float after this or
> not.

Not at all.  I was just noting that this patch will touch on this topic, and it’s not a
topic that I would weigh in on as my opinions are irrelevant in this discussion.

No incendiary topic intended :-)

Michael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux