Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: dwapb: Use human understandable gpio numbering.

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 07/01/2015 09:34 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> index 58faf04..b7e7977 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> @@ -491,6 +491,13 @@ dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(struct device *dev)
>  			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  		}
>  
> +		if (of_property_read_u32(port_np, "snps,base",
> +					 &pp->gpio_base)) {
> +			dev_info(dev, "no base gpio specified for %s\n",
> +				 port_np->full_name);
> +			pp->gpio_base = -1;
> +		}
> +

If you are in a specific SoC you could do
	base = of_alias_get_id(np, "gpio") * num_of_gpio_per_chip
and get consistent numbers / sane.
I think this is the one reason why there is no generic binding for the
starting address. The other reason might be that this is simply a user
space problem. To get consistent numbers all you need to do to lookup
each gpio's memory address and decide if this is the one you look for.

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html