Hi Sören, 2015-05-27 3:37 GMT+09:00 Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 10:12AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Tuesday 26 May 2015 13:18:29 Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c >> > index 04748a4..0ff653c 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c >> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c >> > @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int zynq_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> > >> > pctrl->pctrl = pinctrl_register(&zynq_desc, &pdev->dev, pctrl); >> > if (!pctrl->pctrl) >> > - return -ENOMEM; >> > + return -EINVAL; >> > >> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctrl); >> > >> > >> >> One choice seems as bad as the other to me ;-) >> >> Could we add a pinctrl_register_reason() variant that returns a meaningful >> error code as ERR_PTR? > > I agree with Arnd. As long as we don't get a precise error code we can > just keep the current one. OK. Let's not do this way. I will try pinctrl_register_reason(). -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html