On Tuesday 26 May 2015 13:18:29 Masahiro Yamada wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c > index 04748a4..0ff653c 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c > @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int zynq_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > pctrl->pctrl = pinctrl_register(&zynq_desc, &pdev->dev, pctrl); > if (!pctrl->pctrl) > - return -ENOMEM; > + return -EINVAL; > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctrl); > > One choice seems as bad as the other to me ;-) Could we add a pinctrl_register_reason() variant that returns a meaningful error code as ERR_PTR? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html