On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Rojhalat Ibrahim <imr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There have been concerns that the function names gpiod_set_array() and > gpiod_get_array() might be confusing to users. One might expect > gpiod_get_array() to return array values, while it is actually the array > counterpart of gpiod_get(). To be consistent with the single descriptor API > we could rename gpiod_set_array() to gpiod_set_array_value(). This makes > some function names a bit lengthy: gpiod_set_raw_array_value_cansleep(). It makes the naming consistent, which is a better thing (and some of these names were already long anyway). Acked-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html