On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:53 AM, <Frank.Li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Add i.MX7D clk tree support. >> >> Enable all clock to bring up imx7. >> Clock framework need be modified a little since imx7d >> change clock design. otherwise system will halt and block the >> other part upstream. >> >> All clock refine need wait for Dong Aisheng's patch >> clk: support clocks which requires parent clock on during operation >> Or other solution ready. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <b20788@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso <aalonso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx7d.c | 887 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c | 16 +- >> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk.h | 9 + >> 3 files changed, 911 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx7d.c > > Why is i.MX clock code not moved to drivers/clk? Guo Shawn: what's plan clock code move to driver/clk? Rob: It is not related i.mx7 bring up. There are many upstream work depend on this. we can work on code movement after that. Are you okay? > > Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html