Re: [PATCH] gpio: dwapb: enable for ARC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 09 April 2015 10:29:59 Linus Walleij wrote:
> >
> > make.cross ARCH=blackfin
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb_irq_handler':
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:91:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> > 'readl_relaxed' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb_configure_irqs':
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:212:32: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no
> > member named 'of_node'
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:221:16: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no
> > member named 'of_node'
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb_gpio_add_port':
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:331:14: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no
> > member named 'of_node'
> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > --->8---
> >
> > Probably better fix is to make dwgpio depend on !BLACKFIN because we
> > know it won't be built for it. If there're other arches that don't
> > define [readl|writel]_relaxed() we may add them as well.
> 
> This restrictions should be gone after commit
> 9439eb3ab9d1ece6e4ad7baaa4a7f534f9b9dab0
> "asm-generic: io: implement relaxed accessor macros as conditional wrappers"
> 
> I will make a patch removing the dependencies and see what happens.

Yes, makes sense. I think we don't need anything other than

	depends on OF_GPIO || X86_INTEL_QUARK

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux