On Thursday 09 April 2015 10:29:59 Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > make.cross ARCH=blackfin > > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb_irq_handler': > > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:91:2: error: implicit declaration of function > > 'readl_relaxed' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb_configure_irqs': > > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:212:32: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no > > member named 'of_node' > > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:221:16: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no > > member named 'of_node' > > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb_gpio_add_port': > > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:331:14: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no > > member named 'of_node' > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > --->8--- > > > > Probably better fix is to make dwgpio depend on !BLACKFIN because we > > know it won't be built for it. If there're other arches that don't > > define [readl|writel]_relaxed() we may add them as well. > > This restrictions should be gone after commit > 9439eb3ab9d1ece6e4ad7baaa4a7f534f9b9dab0 > "asm-generic: io: implement relaxed accessor macros as conditional wrappers" > > I will make a patch removing the dependencies and see what happens. Yes, makes sense. I think we don't need anything other than depends on OF_GPIO || X86_INTEL_QUARK Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html