On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 17:03 +-0200, Linus Walleij wrote: +AD4- On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Alexey Brodkin +AD4- +ADw-Alexey.Brodkin+AEA-synopsys.com+AD4- wrote: +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- From: Vineet Gupta +ADw-vgupta+AEA-synopsys.com+AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- Synopsys SDP platform uses DW GPIO controller in design with +AD4- +AD4- ARC cores. So adding ARC to architectures that may select this +AD4- +AD4- GPIO controller. +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- Even though support for Synopsys SDP is yet to be submitted we'll need +AD4- +AD4- this tiny option enabled at least for properly working interrupts (DW +AD4- +AD4- GPIO controller is used as interrupt controller). +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta +ADw-vgupta+AEA-synopsys.com+AD4- +AD4- +AD4- Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin +ADw-abrodkin+AEA-synopsys.com+AD4- +AD4- +AD4- Cc: Andy Shevchenko +ADw-andriy.shevchenko+AEA-linux.intel.com+AD4- +AD4- +AD4- Cc: Linus Walleij +ADw-linus.walleij+AEA-linaro.org+AD4- +AD4- +AD4- Patch applied. +AD4- +AD4- But ... +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- - depends on ((ARM +AHwAfA- ARM64) +ACYAJg- OF+AF8-GPIO) +AHwAfA- X86+AF8-INTEL+AF8-QUARK +AD4- +AD4- +- depends on ((ARC +AHwAfA- ARM +AHwAfA- ARM64) +ACYAJg- OF+AF8-GPIO) +AHwAfA- X86+AF8-INTEL+AF8-QUARK +AD4- +AD4- This is getting a bit silly. What stops us from actually just enabling +AD4- it for any architecture? Agree. That looks like nonsense now. Origin of arch-limitation is http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/gpio/Kconfig?id+AD0-1972c97db5b0c125918f662cd084c7d5370674c0 ---+AD4-8--- gpio: dwapb: fix compile errors Whereas the DWAPB driver does not really depend on the ARM architecture, it uses +AFs-readl+AHw-writel+AF0AXw-relaxed() not found on arch such as Blackfin, so restrict this to ARM until there is another architecture that can make use of it. It is also using the of+AF8-node of the gpiochip, so fix this too by requiring OF+AF8-GPIO. All error/warnings: make.cross ARCH+AD0-blackfin drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb+AF8-irq+AF8-handler': drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:91:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'readl+AF8-relaxed' +AFs--Werror+AD0-implicit-function-declaration+AF0- drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb+AF8-configure+AF8-irqs': drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:212:32: error: 'struct gpio+AF8-chip' has no member named 'of+AF8-node' drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:221:16: error: 'struct gpio+AF8-chip' has no member named 'of+AF8-node' drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb+AF8-gpio+AF8-add+AF8-port': drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:331:14: error: 'struct gpio+AF8-chip' has no member named 'of+AF8-node' cc1: some warnings being treated as errors ---+AD4-8--- Probably better fix is to make dwgpio depend on +ACE-BLACKFIN because we know it won't be built for it. If there're other arches that don't define +AFs-readl+AHw-writel+AF0AXw-relaxed() we may add them as well. -Alexey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html