On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This adds pinctrl and gpio driver to the CX92755 SoC "General Purpose Pin > Mapping" hardware block. The CX92755 is one SoC from the Conexant Digicolor > series. Pin mapping hardware supports configuring pins as either GPIO, or up to > 3 other "client select" functions. This driver adds support for pin muxing > using the generic device tree binding, and a basic gpiolib driver for the GPIO > functionality. > > This driver does not currently support GPIO interrupts, and pad configuration. > > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx> (...) > +struct dc_pinmap { > + void __iomem *regs; > + struct device *dev; > + struct pinctrl_dev *pctl; > + > + struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins; Instead of storing just an array of pinctrl_pin_desc use the .pins in struct pinctrl_desc and store a pointer to your struct pinctrl_desc in this state container. > + const char *pin_names[PINS_COUNT]; This duplicates names that should already be in the .pins array in struct pinctrl_desc, don't do that. > + > + struct gpio_chip chip; > + spinlock_t lock; > +}; > +static const char *dc_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > + unsigned selector) > +{ > + struct dc_pinmap *pmap = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev); > + > + return pmap->pin_names[selector]; > +} Add some comment explaining that you have exactly one group per pin. You are also re-implementing the .pins field in struct pinctrl_desc where each pin is described by a struct pinctrl_pin_desc with special macros available to define them and all. If you want to have one group per pin named like this why not just return pmap->desc->pins[selector].name; ? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html