On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:10:01PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > In acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts() the handle local > variable already contains the value that we want to pass > to acpi_walk_resources(), so it is better to use that > variable instead of evaluating ACPI_HANDLE() once more > for the same device. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio / ACPI: Use local variable instead of ACPI_HANDLE()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio / ACPI: Use local variable instead of ACPI_HANDLE()
- From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:43:53 +0200
- In-reply-to: <15697166.UNaCUJRTg5@vostro.rjw.lan>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
- References:
- [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()
- From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- [PATCH 2/2] gpio / ACPI: Use local variable instead of ACPI_HANDLE()
- From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio / ACPI: Avoid unnecessary checks in __gpiod_get_index()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 6/8] pinctrl: cygnus: add gpio/pinconf driver
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/2] gpio / ACPI: Use local variable instead of ACPI_HANDLE()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio / ACPI: Use local variable instead of ACPI_HANDLE()
- Index(es):
 |