On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 03:00:16PM +0100, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote: > On Wednesday 11 February 2015 22:31:12 Alexandre Courbot wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Rojhalat Ibrahim <imr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wednesday 11 February 2015 12:30:01 Mika Westerberg wrote: > > >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 02:40:52PM +0100, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote: > > >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > > >> > + > > >> > +static unsigned int acpi_gpio_package_count(const union acpi_object *obj) > > >> > +{ > > >> > + const union acpi_object *element = obj->package.elements; > > >> > + const union acpi_object *end = element + obj->package.count; > > >> > + unsigned int count = 0; > > >> > + > > >> > + while (element < end) { > > >> > + if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE) > > >> > + count++; > > >> > + > > >> > + element++; > > >> > + } > > >> > + return count; > > >> > +} > > >> > + > > >> > +static int acpi_find_gpio_count(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data) > > >> > +{ > > >> > + unsigned int *count = data; > > >> > + > > >> > + if (ares->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_GPIO) > > >> > + *count += ares->data.gpio.pin_table_length; > > >> > + > > >> > + return 1; > > >> > +} > > >> > + > > >> > +static int acpi_gpio_count(struct device *dev, const char *con_id) > > >> > +{ > > >> > + struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev); > > >> > + const union acpi_object *obj; > > >> > + const struct acpi_gpio_mapping *gm; > > >> > + int count = -ENOENT; > > >> > + int ret; > > >> > + char propname[32]; > > >> > + unsigned int i; > > >> > + > > >> > + /* Try first from _DSD */ > > >> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_suffixes); i++) { > > >> > + if (con_id && strcmp(con_id, "gpios")) > > >> > + snprintf(propname, sizeof(propname), "%s-%s", > > >> > + con_id, gpio_suffixes[i]); > > >> > + else > > >> > + snprintf(propname, sizeof(propname), "%s", > > >> > + gpio_suffixes[i]); > > >> > + > > >> > + ret = acpi_dev_get_property(adev, propname, ACPI_TYPE_ANY, > > >> > + &obj); > > >> > + if (ret == 0) { > > >> > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE) > > >> > + count = 1; > > >> > + else if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE) > > >> > + count = acpi_gpio_package_count(obj); > > >> > + } else if (adev->driver_gpios) { > > >> > + for (gm = adev->driver_gpios; gm->name; gm++) > > >> > + if (strcmp(propname, gm->name) == 0) { > > >> > + count = gm->size; > > >> > + break; > > >> > + } > > >> > + } > > >> > + if (count >= 0) > > >> > + break; > > >> > + } > > >> > + > > >> > + /* Then from plain _CRS GPIOs */ > > >> > + if (count < 0) { > > >> > + struct list_head resource_list; > > >> > + unsigned int crs_count = 0; > > >> > + > > >> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list); > > >> > + acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list, > > >> > + acpi_find_gpio_count, &crs_count); > > >> > + acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list); > > >> > + if (crs_count > 0) > > >> > + count = crs_count; > > >> > + } > > >> > + return count; > > >> > +} > > >> > + > > >> > +#else > > >> > + > > >> > +static int acpi_gpio_count(struct device *dev, const char *con_id) > > >> > +{ > > >> > + return -ENODEV; > > >> > +} > > >> > + > > >> > +#endif > > >> > > >> It just occured to me that it would be better to put this code to > > >> gpiolib-acpi.c and declare acpi_gpio_count() in drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h. > > >> > > > > > > Ok. I will also have to move the definition of gpio_suffixes[] (PATCH 1/4) > > > to drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h since it is needed by both the OF and the ACPI > > > portions of the code. > > > > We will really need to factorize this lookup code. I will give it a > > look, but first I'd like to merge this good stuff. > > > > I am mixed about moving these declarations into gpiolib.h - maybe have > > one static declaration per file instead, especially since lookup on > > ACPI is not necessarily the same as lookup on DT. It makes sense to > > have it that way. > > > > If we do one static declaration per file then acpi_find_gpio() in gpiolib.c > is going to use potentially different suffixes from acpi_gpio_count() in > gpiolib-acpi.c. That can't be good. > > Furthermore it seems to me that while the suffixes do not necessarily have to > be the same for ACPI and DT, they are now, and it may even be desirable to > keep them consistent as long as there is no reason for not doing so. Yeah, I didn't realize that by moving stuff to gpiolib-acpi.c you need to duplicate gpio_suffixes as well. So either leave it as is now or then we can have a bit stricter suffixes for ACPI (which I would prefer). In other words we only accept "foo-gpios" or "gpios". The only user currently is rfkill-gpio.c and that already has "-gpios" there. I think Alexandre suggested that already some time ago when we were discussing about ACPI properties wrt. GPIOs. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html