On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Rojhalat Ibrahim <imr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday 11 February 2015 12:30:01 Mika Westerberg wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 02:40:52PM +0100, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote: >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI >> > + >> > +static unsigned int acpi_gpio_package_count(const union acpi_object *obj) >> > +{ >> > + const union acpi_object *element = obj->package.elements; >> > + const union acpi_object *end = element + obj->package.count; >> > + unsigned int count = 0; >> > + >> > + while (element < end) { >> > + if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE) >> > + count++; >> > + >> > + element++; >> > + } >> > + return count; >> > +} >> > + >> > +static int acpi_find_gpio_count(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data) >> > +{ >> > + unsigned int *count = data; >> > + >> > + if (ares->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_GPIO) >> > + *count += ares->data.gpio.pin_table_length; >> > + >> > + return 1; >> > +} >> > + >> > +static int acpi_gpio_count(struct device *dev, const char *con_id) >> > +{ >> > + struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev); >> > + const union acpi_object *obj; >> > + const struct acpi_gpio_mapping *gm; >> > + int count = -ENOENT; >> > + int ret; >> > + char propname[32]; >> > + unsigned int i; >> > + >> > + /* Try first from _DSD */ >> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_suffixes); i++) { >> > + if (con_id && strcmp(con_id, "gpios")) >> > + snprintf(propname, sizeof(propname), "%s-%s", >> > + con_id, gpio_suffixes[i]); >> > + else >> > + snprintf(propname, sizeof(propname), "%s", >> > + gpio_suffixes[i]); >> > + >> > + ret = acpi_dev_get_property(adev, propname, ACPI_TYPE_ANY, >> > + &obj); >> > + if (ret == 0) { >> > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE) >> > + count = 1; >> > + else if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE) >> > + count = acpi_gpio_package_count(obj); >> > + } else if (adev->driver_gpios) { >> > + for (gm = adev->driver_gpios; gm->name; gm++) >> > + if (strcmp(propname, gm->name) == 0) { >> > + count = gm->size; >> > + break; >> > + } >> > + } >> > + if (count >= 0) >> > + break; >> > + } >> > + >> > + /* Then from plain _CRS GPIOs */ >> > + if (count < 0) { >> > + struct list_head resource_list; >> > + unsigned int crs_count = 0; >> > + >> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list); >> > + acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list, >> > + acpi_find_gpio_count, &crs_count); >> > + acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list); >> > + if (crs_count > 0) >> > + count = crs_count; >> > + } >> > + return count; >> > +} >> > + >> > +#else >> > + >> > +static int acpi_gpio_count(struct device *dev, const char *con_id) >> > +{ >> > + return -ENODEV; >> > +} >> > + >> > +#endif >> >> It just occured to me that it would be better to put this code to >> gpiolib-acpi.c and declare acpi_gpio_count() in drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h. >> > > Ok. I will also have to move the definition of gpio_suffixes[] (PATCH 1/4) > to drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h since it is needed by both the OF and the ACPI > portions of the code. We will really need to factorize this lookup code. I will give it a look, but first I'd like to merge this good stuff. I am mixed about moving these declarations into gpiolib.h - maybe have one static declaration per file instead, especially since lookup on ACPI is not necessarily the same as lookup on DT. It makes sense to have it that way. > >> That said, I tested this code on Lenovo Thinkpad10 by converting >> drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c to fetch its GPIOs using this new >> API -- it works just fine (and looks better). >> >> Once you have done the above change you can add for the ACPI parts, >> >> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > Great. Thanks. Hopefully the next revision will be the right one! :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html