Re: gpio-pxa: getting GPIOs by devicetree phandle broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> The issue with multiple gpiochips per of-node could be worked around as followed I believe, comments?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> index 08261f2..43984ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> @@ -47,11 +47,12 @@ static int of_gpiochip_find_and_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data)
>         ret = gc->of_xlate(gc, &gg_data->gpiospec, gg_data->flags);
>         if (ret < 0) {
>                 /* We've found the gpio chip, but the translation failed.
> -                * Return true to stop looking and return the translation
> -                * error via out_gpio
> +                * Store translation error in out_gpio.
> +                * Return false to keep looking, as more than one GPIO chip
> +                * could be registered per of-node.
>                  */
>                 gg_data->out_gpio = ERR_PTR(ret);
> -               return true;
> +               return false;
>          }
>
>         gg_data->out_gpio = gpiochip_get_desc(gc, ret);

As long as we're ok with multiple gpiochips per of-node, this would
work for me. It'll change the preference of which chip returns the
error in the case of multiple chips, but that's already undefined
behavior.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux