On 2/3/2015 12:00 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 11:29:36AM -0800, Ray Jui wrote: >> On 2/3/2015 9:40 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 06:01:33PM -0800, Ray Jui wrote: >>>> + >>>> +/* >>>> + * List of pins in Cygnus >>>> + */ >>>> +static struct cygnus_pin cygnus_pins[] = { >>> >>> const? >>> >> I cannot make it const here, since the address of "gpio_mux" is later >> passed to pinctrl_pin_desc's private data: >> >> pins[i].drv_data = &cygnus_pins[i].gpio_mux; > > The pinctrl code says: > > "@drv_data: driver-defined per-pin data. pinctrl core does not touch > this" > > so we could theoretically cast away the constness and restore it when > we access drv_data in pin control methods, but I won't insist. I am > not sure which way looks nicer. > > Thanks. > Yeah, I agreed that by declaring the cygnus_pins array const, it makes it more obvious that "we do not expect any of its parameters to change." But later if we cast &gpio_mux to void * before assigned to drv_data of pinctrl_pin_desc, we sort of break it up...I'll keep this part of code as it is for now. Thanks, Ray -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html