Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] gpio: add parameter to allow the use named gpios

[Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 02:16:00PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:12:53AM -0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Olliver Schinagl
> > > <o.schinagl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >> From: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>
> > >> The gpio binding document says that new code should always use named
> > >> gpios. Patch 40b73183 added support to parse a list of gpios from child
> > >> nodes, but does not make it possible to use named gpios. This patch adds
> > >> the con_id property and implements it is done in gpiolib.c, where the
> > >> old-style of using unnamed gpios still works.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> ---
> > >>  drivers/gpio/devres.c                     | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> > >>  drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c |  2 +-
> > >>  drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c                  |  2 +-
> > >>  include/linux/gpio/consumer.h             |  1 +
> > >
> > > Alexandre: does this match your vision of how it should work, i.e. ACK?
> > >
> > > Bryan/Dmitry: can you ACK the oneliners in your subsystems?
> > 
> > Sure, please take my Ack
> > Acked-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Mine as well:
> 
> Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>

Forgot to mention: the ack is for this patch only; the patch #4 is
NAKed because:

1. The logic of handling old and new name AFAICS is broken and
2. gpio_keys_polled-gpios as name is plain ugly.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html