On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This platform_driver does not need to set an owner, it will be populated by the > driver core. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied, thanks! Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 07/28] gpio: drop owner assignment from platform_drivers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/28] gpio: drop owner assignment from platform_drivers
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:15:31 +0100
- In-reply-to: <1419196495-9626-8-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de>
- References:
- [PATCH 00/28] remove .owner for most platform_drivers: the missing bits
- From: Wolfram Sang
- [PATCH 07/28] gpio: drop owner assignment from platform_drivers
- From: Wolfram Sang
- [PATCH 00/28] remove .owner for most platform_drivers: the missing bits
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] gpio: Add find GPIO base in increasing order
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] gpio: Add find GPIO base in increasing order
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 07/28] gpio: drop owner assignment from platform_drivers
- Next by thread: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: sa1100: split irq handling for low GPIOs
- Index(es):
 |