Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: dln2: use bus_sync_unlock instead of scheduling work

[Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Octavian Purdila
> <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Octavian Purdila
>>> <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Use the irq_chip bus_sync_unlock method to update hardware registers
>>>> instead of scheduling work from the mask/unmask methods. This simplifies
>>>> a bit the driver and make it more uniform with the other GPIO IRQ
>>>> drivers.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Patch applied for fixes.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> I don't see the patch applied, could you please consider it for the
>> -for-next branch?
>
> Ah sorry I thought only the first patch was a critical fix.
> Applied this to fixes too now. Working on queueing the
> GPIO fixes.

Hi Linus,

Its not a critical fix, its just a clean-up. I thought it would go in
the the for-next branch (for 3.20) and since I did not see it there I
thought it got lost.

Sorry for any confusion I may have caused, I am not familiar with the
GPIO branch work-flow.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html