Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: dln2: use bus_sync_unlock instead of scheduling work

[Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Octavian Purdila
> <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Use the irq_chip bus_sync_unlock method to update hardware registers
>> instead of scheduling work from the mask/unmask methods. This simplifies
>> a bit the driver and make it more uniform with the other GPIO IRQ
>> drivers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Patch applied for fixes.
>

Hi Linus,

I don't see the patch applied, could you please consider it for the
-for-next branch?

Thanks,
Tavi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html